Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true. If some proposition has not yet been proved true, we are not entitled on that ground alone to conclude that it is false and vice versa.[1][2] In debates, appealing to ignorance is sometimes an attempt to shift the burden of proof. The term was likely coined by philosopher John Locke in the late 17th century.[3][4]
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search